back to top
Friday, November 22, 2024
HomeUPSC Mains Question BankUPSC Mains GS 2 Questions BankHow does judicial review influence the balance of power among state legislatures,...

How does judicial review influence the balance of power among state legislatures, the judiciary, and the executive branch, and what implications does this have for public policy formulation, federalism, and the protection of civil rights?


Introduction

Judicial review acts as a vital tool in preserving the distribution of authority among the governmental branches in India: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. By scrutinizing the constitutionality of the actions taken by the legislative and executive bodies, judicial review influences the development of public policy, affects federalism, and defends civil liberties. The progression of this concept can be observed through numerous landmark decisions that highlight the evolving interplay among these entities.

Impact on the Distribution of Power

  • Checks and Balances: Judicial review functions as a counterbalance to the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that enacted laws align with the Constitution. For example, the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established the “basic structure” doctrine, contending that certain essential aspects of the Constitution cannot be modified.
  • Safeguarding Fundamental Rights: The judiciary’s function in evaluating governmental actions has significant consequences for the preservation of civil rights. The Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) decision broadened the interpretation of Article 21, underscoring that the right to life and personal liberty cannot be limited without just and fair processes.
  • Interpretation of Constitutional Texts: Through judicial review, the judiciary has the power to reinterpret legislation, influencing legislative intentions and executive enforcement. The Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India (2018) verdict decriminalized consensual same-sex relationships under Section 377, mirroring shifting societal values.
  • Federalism and State Sovereignty: By evaluating state laws, the judiciary guarantees adherence to the allocation of powers outlined in the Constitution, which is crucial for preserving federalism in India. Cases such as State of West Bengal vs. Union of India (1964) have highlighted the judiciary’s role in sustaining this federal equilibrium.
  • Constraints on Legislative Proposals: Judicial review frequently restricts legislative initiatives that contravene constitutional provisions, thus prompting lawmakers to draft legislation more prudently. The Shayara Bano case (2017) nullified the practice of instant triple talaq, illustrating the judiciary’s role in preserving rights compatible with Islamic principles.

Consequences for Public Policy Development

  • Stakeholder Participation: The potential for judicial activism promotes increased transparency and public engagement in policy development, evident in environmental policies contested in cases like MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1986).
  • Policy Advancement: Judicial rulings can catalyze inventive policy-making, as demonstrated by the PILs (Public Interest Litigations) tackling matters such as environmental harm and social equity.
  • Long-lasting Effects: Court judgments can have enduring repercussions, as new laws or amendments must conform to constitutional requirements, fostering more substantial and sustainable policy frameworks.
  • Advice for Legislators: Judicial rulings can provide guidance to state legislatures on important topics, although they may generate tensions between branches when gaps exist within legislation.
  • Potential for Overreach: While judicial review is essential for maintaining checks, concerns may arise regarding judicial overreach that can undermine legislative power, igniting discussions about the proper extent of judiciary involvement in policy issues.

Conclusion

Ultimately, judicial review molds the framework of governance in India, influencing the equilibrium between various branches of government. By safeguarding civil rights and ensuring compliance with constitutional requirements, it fosters robust public policy development while upholding federalism. Nevertheless, it is crucial that the implementation of this authority remains restrained and prudent to avert encroachment upon the democratic arena reserved for the legislative process.

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments